Assessment of Specificity and Sensitivity of Tru-Cut Biopsy as Compared with Postoperative Histopathological Results in Young Females with Breast Mass
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56981/M313Keywords:
Assessment of specificity and sensitivity, Tru-cut biopsy Breast massAbstract
Breast cancer affects 5-7% of 25-39-year-olds, and early detection increases the chance of recurrence (CBC). African- American women under the age of 40 had the highest rate of breast cancer. After breast cancer radiation and family history, younger persons are more likely to get colon cancer. Some women misdiagnose breast symptoms as cancer due to fear and stress. A clinical examination cannot distinguish between benign and malignant tumours.
Stages of treatment the diagnosis decides the treatment. Biopsies and FNAC are used to detect lumps. Plaques. Biopsies of histopathology (CNB) (CNB). OTP biopsy failed. True-cut biopsies minimize the types and grades of malignancy. Bleeds/infects FNAC detects cancer. Cytology is inexpensive. Low sample counts, erroneous negatives, and aggressive tumours According to the study, FNAC assesses breast lumps. False positives and false negatives could be reduced. CNB's results call into question FNAC's mission. CNB. The downsides of CNB include treatment time, patient pain (1.7% to 3.7%), hematoma (0.72%), and pneumothorax. FNAC is less painful and intrusive than CNB for older, weaker patients (more painless). FNAC is not just for radiologists. FNAC examines chemotherapy. Antifreeze. CNB, diagnosis, and anxiety were all improved with FNAC. After neoadjuvant treatment, FNAC reveals tumours, suspicious zones, and a concerning lesion. FNAC replaces mammography.
References
1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. 2021;71(3):209-49.
2. Assi HA, Khoury KE, Dbouk H, Khalil LE, Mouhieddine TH, El Saghir NSJJotd. Epidemiology and prognosis of breast cancer in young women. 2013;5(Suppl 1):S2.
3. DeSantis C, Ma J, Bryan L, Jemal AJCacjfc. Breast cancer statistics, 2013. 2014;64(1):52-62.
4. Reyna C, Lee MCJJomh. Breast cancer in young women: special considerations in multidisciplinary care. 2014;7:419.
5. DeRose YS, Wang G, Lin Y-C, Bernard PS, Buys SS, Ebbert MT, et al. Tumor grafts derived from women with breast cancer authentically reflect tumour pathology, growth, metastasis and disease outcomes. 2011;17(11):1514-20.
6. Tripathi K, Yadav R, Maurya SK. A Comparative Study Between Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology and Core Needle Biopsy in Diagnosing Clinically Palpable Breast Lumps. Cureus. 2022;14(8):e27709.
7. Ariizumi T, Kawashima H, Yamagishi T, Oike N, Murayama Y, Umezu H, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of fine needle aspiration cytology and core needle biopsy in bone and soft tissue tumour: A comparative study of the image-guided and blindly performed procedure. 2022;59:151936.
8. Bennett IC, Saboo AJWJoS. The evolving role of vacuum-assisted biopsy of the breast: a progression from fine-needle aspiration biopsy. 2019;43(4):1054-61.
9. Garbar C, Curé HJISRN. Fine-needle aspiration cytology can play a role in neoadjuvant chemotherapy in operable breast cancer. 2013;2013.
10. Mondal R, Koley S, Biswas PKJIJoS. Comparative Study Between Intraoperative Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology/Imprint Cytology and Frozen Section in Determination of Tumour Margin. 2018;80(6):554-8.
11. Kar A, Satapathy B, Pattnaik K, Dash PKJJoc. Trucut biopsy vs FNAC of pelvic tumours-who wins the match? 2018;35(3):179.
12. Supriya S, Nirmala C, Raghupathi AJIJoCR, Review. Fine needle aspiration cytology versus core needle biopsy in breast lesions-a comparative study. 2015;7(9):52.
13. Faziludeen S, Sankaran PJIJoR. A belief theory-based decision system for breast cancer data. 2021:1-12.
14. Soni A, Guliani A, Nehra K, Mehta PKJERoRM. Insight into diagnosis of pleural tuberculosis with a special focus on nucleic acid amplification tests. 2022;16(8):887-906.
15. Mahdavi R, Mehrvarz S, Hoseinpour P, Yousefpour N, Abbasvandi F, Tayebi M, et al. Intraradiological pathology‐calibrated electrical impedance spectroscopy in the evaluation of excision‐required breast lesions. 2022;49(4):2746-60.
16. Chaitanya I, Prabhala S, Annapurna Srirambhatla DAJI. Comparison of histopathologic findings with BIRADS score in Tru-cut biopsies of breast lesions. 2020;9(1):35-41.
17. Kim SH, Kim YSJJoUiM. Ultrasonographic and mammographic findings of male breast disease. 2019;38(1):243-52.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
