The Problem of Mahmoud Muhammad Taha in Dealing with The Sunnis and Citing the Prophet's Hadiths

Abstract

In this research tagged with (The Problem of Mahmoud Muhammad Taha in dealing with the Sunnis and citing the Prophet's hadiths .The two researchers dealt with the hadiths attributed by Mahmoud to the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him), and investigated the sources of Mahmoud Muhammad Taha on which he relied in martyrdom, and stood on the graduation of what he mentioned in his books claiming that he is from the Prophet's Sunnah The extent to which he agrees with or contradicts the correct method of citing the hadiths of the Prophet Muhammad with regard to the validity and weakness of the hadiths, and we have shown examples of the aspects of citing false and established hadiths. Which has no origin in the books of Mahmoud Muhammad Taha. Mahmoud Muhammad Taha contradicted the concept of Sunnah recognized among jurists as he stated that it was the work of the Prophet in his own private and that it was his individual mandate. Mahmud's Sunnah is the revelation of Allah the Almighty to his Prophet Mustafa, who commanded him to work with him in his own right. In the Prophet's hadith, Mahmud rarely produced the hadiths on which he was based, so the researchers’ graduated samples of the hadiths that he cited according to what the scholars of Hadith have been termed since the inception of this science, which is unique to the Islamic ummah. Then the critical vision was present about his inference from the hadith. One of the most important findings of the two researchers is that Mahmud is ignorant of the Sunnah by inferring in his books and publications hadiths that have no origin; not from the hadith of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him); some of which are mentioned in the Israelites and have no known attribution to the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him). And in attributing some of them who are left to talk to his lie. Some of them are from the status of Sufism and have no origin. The researchers followed the descriptive and analytical approach through the methods of deduction and induction as well as the comparative approach to reaching their goals.